AIGR.ID vs Ray/RayServe/Anyscale Ecosystem Comparison
Based on the comparison points, AIGr.id appears to offer several capabilities that are either missing or limited in the Ray/Anyscale/RayServe ecosystem:
-
Decentralized, Polycentric Network & Governance:
AIGr.id is designed as a global public infrastructure for AI, not owned or controlled by any single entity. It is contributed to and accessed as a digital commons, powered by the 100% open-source and community-driven OpenOS.AI. This contrasts with Ray/Anyscale, where Ray is open source but the platform is managed by Anyscale, especially on public clouds. AIGr.id supports building and coordinating multiple cognitive architectures and composing modular, networked AI systems. -
Multi-Cluster Workflow Spanning:
AIGr.id supports AI workflows (vDAGs) where interconnected AI components can span multiple clusters. In contrast, Ray workflows cannot span multiple clusters because Ray clusters themselves are restricted to single Kubernetes clusters. -
Deep Programmability via Turing Complete Policies:
AIGr.id enables deep customization through programmable Python-based policies that are Turing complete. These can execute locally as functions, graphs, or jobs and provide control over scheduling, resource allocation, load balancing, auditing, quota management, and AI block/workflow node assignment. Ray/Anyscale supports limited rule definitions via IAM and RBAC, with only partial support for policy-like customization in specific modules like the autoscaler. -
Built-in Decentralized Registries:
AIGr.id includes decentralized registries for assets, container images, AI components, and specifications, which are globally discoverable and reusable across the network. These platform-native registries are not present in Ray/Anyscale. -
Persistent Database Storage and Management:
AIGr.id includes FrameDB for in-memory and persistent object storage, with TiDB integration and S3-like backup/restore capabilities. Ray supports in-memory sharing via Plasma Store but lacks built-in support for persistent storage and backup management. -
Advanced Workflow Composition Features:
AIGr.id supports nested workflows, allowing one vDAG to reference another, and enables sharing of AI blocks across multiple workflows. Ray/Anyscale does not support such nested or shared workflow features. -
Specific Customization Points in AI Block Functionality:
AIGr.id provides several block-level customization features, such as: - Implementing custom management commands using the AIOS instance SDK.
- Adding sidecar containers as utility components in AI block pods.
-
Writing fully customizable batching logic beyond fixed parameters.
-
Native Stream Data and Video Inference Support:
AIGr.id includes native support for stream data ingestion and video/live camera inference. These features are not built-in to the Ray/Anyscale ecosystem and must be manually developed. -
Automating Third-Party Service Deployment:
AIGr.id enables automation of third-party service deployment using init containers during AI block creation. This functionality is not available in Ray/Anyscale. -
Custom Model Splitting Across Clusters:
AIGr.id supports custom model splitting and distributed inference across clusters. Ray supports multi-node LLM deployment through integrations like vLLM, but lacks native support for custom model splitting across cluster boundaries.
In summary, AIGr.id differentiates itself by focusing on a decentralized architecture, extensive policy-driven programmability for fine-grained control across a multi-cluster network, built-in features for persistent data management and sharing assets, and specific customization points within AI workflows and blocks, as well as native stream/video data support. Ray/Anyscale, conversely, is presented more as a unified framework for scaling traditional ML and Python workloads, with robust MLOps features, dynamic autoscaling leveraging cloud APIs, and fault tolerance for centralized or cloud-based deployments.
Detailed AIGR.ID vs Ray/Anyscale/RayServe Comparision table
1. Platform Architecture and Foundation
This category covers the core structure, underlying principles, network topology, infrastructure requirements, built-in registries, and fundamental data management aspects of the platforms.
Sl no | Comparison | AIGR.ID | AnyScale/RayServe/Ray ecosystem |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Definition | AIGr.id is a decentralized network of interconnected AI components that coordinate to share data, perform tasks, and compose into higher-level collective intelligence. | Ray is an open-source unified framework for scaling AI and Python applications like machine learning. It provides the compute layer for parallel processing. Anyscale is a platform built on top of Ray to manage deployments on a Ray cluster. |
2 | Multi-cluster support | Yes. Multiple federated clusters can be part of the AIGr.id network, managed by a management cluster. Clusters can be deployed on heterogeneous clouds, data-centers or homegrown clusters. | Yes, Multiple clouds can be part of the Anyscale configuration. Anyscale schedules Ray workflows on these clusters based on resource availability. Ray cluster, however, cannot spawn across multiple Kubernetes clusters. |
3 | Can run without kubernetes? | No | Yes, the components of the ecosystem like RayServe and Ray can run without kubernetes. |
4 | Built-in managed VPC for nodes federation | No, depends on custom VPC, VPN or firewall settings. Allows clusters to use Tailscale, WireGuard or any VPN service under the hood. | Yes, provides a built-in VPC which uses Tailscale under the hood. |
5 | Persistent Storage Options available | Object storage - ceph (using assets registry APIs), remote. Local file-system volume of the node, FrameDB persistent storage. | Object storage - remote only, Local file system volume of the node, Shared network storage using NFS (network file-system). |
6 | Built-in registries to store assets, container images, components and specifications for re-use | Yes: Assets registry (files, code, models), Container registry (internal + external), Components registry (AI instance images), Spec store (vDAGs, blocks specs). | No. |
7 | Built-in Cross language programming | No. User can interact with other languages by packaging them and handling conversions/calling conventions explicitly. | Partial. Java to Python and Python to Java cross programming is supported. |
8 | In-memory shared database support for storing objects locally and globally | Yes, FrameDB. | Yes, Plasma Store. |
9 | Persistent database storage support for storing objects in a persistent storage volume locally and globally | Yes, TiDB integration with FrameDB. | No. |
10 | Backup and restore of in-memory/persistent objects to S3 like object storage | Yes. | No. |
11 | Sharing of objects across multiple nodes and creation of local copies | Yes. | Yes. |
12 | In-memory/Persistent object store serialization format | Flexible. Serialization/deserialization handled by application; stores raw bytes. | Apache Arrow serialization and deserialization format. |
13 | Reference counting and garbage collection of objects with zero reference count | Yes. | Yes. |
14 | Recovery of lost objects using Lineage reconstruction | No. | Yes. |
15 | Core communication data format | Protobuf and flexible serialization/deserialization formats using in-memory FrameDB. | Plasma Object (PyArrow format). |
2. Resource Management and System Orchestration
This category focuses on how compute resources are allocated, scheduled, and managed, including policy controls, scaling, load balancing, and handling accelerators.
Sl no | Comparison | AIGR.ID | AnyScale/RayServe/Ray ecosystem |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nodes federation / Machine pooling support | Yes, nodes can be added to the existing cluster. | Yes, nodes can be added to the existing cluster (Known as customer managed machine pool). |
2 | Flexible network/cluster governance using programmable policies | Yes, Custom python policies can be deployed to govern addition/removal of clusters, scheduling workloads, executing management clusters at both management cluster and individual worker cluster levels. | No, Limited set of rule definitions are supported based on the IAM and RBAC rules provided by the cloud vendors. |
3 | Programmable turing complete policies and built-in policies execution system | Yes, AIGR.ID is built with customizability in mind, thus programmable policies are supported across multiple functionalities using a Turing complete python programming language. Provides a built-in system to execute these policies locally within modules or deployed as functions/graphs/jobs. | No. Autoscaler of Ray/Anyscale provides customizable policy-like interface using python but no extensive support for customizability across different functionalities. |
4 | Supports scaling of individual AI blocks that are part of the workflow | Yes. | Yes. |
5 | Support for manual scaling of AI blocks | Yes. | Yes. |
6 | Support for specifying min and max replicas per AI block | Yes. | Yes. |
7 | Support for autoscaling based on metrics | Yes. | Yes. |
8 | Autoscaling using programmable policy for flexible decision making | Yes, Autoscaler is completely programmable using the policies system. | Yes, Autoscaler is completely programmable using python and ray library. |
9 | Support for NVIDIA GPU Accelerators for AI block scheduling | Yes. GPU based metrics collection and scheduling is supported by default. | Yes. |
10 | Support for Google TPUs, Intel Gaudi, Huawei Ascend for AI block scheduling | No. But there are plans to support these in the future. | Yes. Supported using community contributions. |
11 | Framework for porting custom accelerators | No. | Yes. |
12 | Framework for adding custom accelerators for resource allocation | Yes. | Yes. |
13 | Horizontal Cluster scaling - adding more nodes to the cluster on the fly based on the demand | No. Clusters must be pre-configured. Scaling happens within available resources. New nodes can be added manually. | Yes. Anyscale/Ray can tap into cloud vendor's infrastructure APIs to autoscale by adding more nodes. |
14 | Customizable AI scheduling (allocation) using programmable policies | Yes. Resource allocation for AI blocks can be customized using a python policy. | No. Provides fixed resource allocation strategies. |
15 | Concept of Placement groups, i.e bundling of resources and assigning them to tasks readily | No. | Yes. Useful for gang scheduling in deep learning training but also for inference serving. |
16 | Customizable and programmable load balancing between the replicas of the AI block | Yes. Load balancer logic can be implemented using custom python policy. | No. |
17 | AI blocks replica health checking | Yes. Periodic health checking of all replicas. | Yes. Periodic health checking of all replicas. |
18 | Customizable and programmable health anomaly detection | Yes. Programmable python policy can be used to ingest health check data and detect anomaly. | No. |
19 | Support for deploying the AI block on multiple GPUs | Yes. If supported by the inference framework. | Yes. If supported by the inference framework. |
20 | Support for deploying multiple AI blocks on same GPU (GPU sharing) | Yes. | Yes. |
3. AI/ML Workload Development and Execution
This category focuses on features specifically for building, defining, deploying, and running AI/ML models and workflows, including SDKs, workflow composition, model serving, training, and specialized AI capabilities.
Sl no | Comparison | AIGR.ID | AnyScale/RayServe/Ray ecosystem |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Support for multi-cluster AI workflows | Yes. The interconnected AI components that form a workflow can spawn across multiple clusters. | No. The interconnected AI components that are part of the ray workflow cannot spawn across multiple clusters as Ray clusters. |
2 | SDKs to build and deploy AI instances | Yes. | Yes. |
3 | Base docker images to build the docker images of AI instances | Yes. | Yes. |
4 | Support for composable AI as workflows (Model composition/vDAGs) | Yes. | Yes. |
5 | Composable AI specification type | JSON with template based parsing. | Python code using ray library. |
6 | Support for conditional routing within the workflow | Yes. | Yes. |
7 | Support for nested workflows - reference an already deployed workflow in the current workflow/vDAG | Yes. Already existing vDAGs can be referenced within the current vDAG by specifying the vDAG URI. | No. |
8 | Sharing of the AI blocks across multiple workflows | Yes. A block can be shared across multiple workflows by assigning the node of the workflow to it. | No. Sharing the same block (or component) of the workflow is not supported. |
9 | Built-in model training infrastructure | No. | Yes. |
10 | Support for side-cars as utility applications connected to the main AI component | Yes. Side-cars can be spinned up as a custom pod connected to the main AI block for extending its functionality. | No. |
11 | Customizable batching logic | Yes. Developers can write custom batching logic using AIOS instance SDK. | No. Fixed batching parameters can be provided for batching function. |
12 | AI block selection for inference task submission using a programmable selection logic | Yes. Inference task submission can contain a search query that can be used to select a right AI block for AI inference. | No. |
13 | Assignment of Workflow DAG nodes on existing blocks using programmable assignment logic | Yes. vDAG spec can contain a programmable selection/assignment python policy for each node, evaluated to select a block. | No. |
14 | Model Multiplexing | No. But can be achieved by specifying the AI block selection query when submitting the inference task. | Yes. Built-in selection for model multiplexing. |
15 | Connecting external / third party servers to the AI blocks | Yes. | Yes. The block can contain python functions that can interact with third party external services. |
16 | Automating the deployment of third party services on the cluster using init containers at the time of AI block creation | Yes. | No. |
17 | Support for streaming inference | Yes. Data can be supplied as streams. | Yes. Data can be supplied as streams. |
18 | Support for batch inference | Yes. Data-sets can be stored in in-memory or persistent local databases of Frame-DB for batch inference. | Yes. Data can be stored in the plasma store for batch inference. |
19 | Out of band communication support using NCCL | Yes, but very limited alpha support. | Yes. |
20 | Custom communication protocol between blocks of the workflow (Out of band communication) | No. | Yes. |
21 | Custom pre and post-processor for each node in the AI workflow | Yes. | Yes. |
22 | Support for multiple inference frameworks and libraries | Yes. Libraries can be imported, used, and packaged with the block. | Yes. |
23 | Support for deploying and serving LLM models | Yes. | Yes. |
24 | Support for Composing of AI workflows constituting LLM and non-LLM models | Yes. | Yes. |
25 | OpenAI compatible API for LLM serving | No. But will be added in the future. | Yes. |
26 | Multi-node LLM deployment with built-in splitting of LLM models and distribution | No built-in support. Can be deployed using third party vLLM cluster with init container automation. | Yes. Using built-in vLLM integration. |
27 | Support for custom model splitting and distributed inference across clusters | Yes. But very limited set of model architectures support splitting. | No. |
28 | Engine agnostic architecture for LLM inference | Yes. Any LLM serving library can be embedded or third party server linked, automated with init containers. | Yes. |
29 | Multi-LoRA support with shared base models | No. | Yes. |
30 | Fast model loading with safe tensors and local machine cache | No. But will be added in the future. | Yes. |
31 | Built-in Ingestion support for stream data | Yes. | No. |
32 | Video/Live camera inference support | Yes. | No. Can be built in application layer, but no library support exists. |
33 | Supports non AI workflowns and non-AI computation as blocks | Yes. | Yes. |
4. Operational Aspects and Developer Experience
This category includes features related to monitoring, logging, debugging, user interfaces, APIs, configuration management, and general usability and support for developers and administrators.
Sl no | Comparison | AIGR.ID | AnyScale/RayServe/Ray ecosystem |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Built-in secret management for credentials, API keys storage | No. Secret management is in the roadmap. | Yes. Anyscale can tap into the secret management stores provided by cloud vendors. |
2 | Built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines | No. | Yes. |
3 | Metrics storage solution | Yes. Provides both default built-in storage (for policy decisions) and optional long term storage (Prometheus stack not deployed by default). | Yes. Not part of RayServe but metrics storage solution is provided in the AnyScale stack. |
4 | Support for custom application metrics | Yes. | Yes. |
5 | Built-in Platform/System metrics | Yes. | Yes. |
6 | Built-in collection of hardware metrics | Yes. Hardware metrics collected by metrics collector daemonset on every node by default. | Yes. Ray exports hardware metrics as part of built-in platform metrics. |
7 | Dashboard UI for management | No. | Yes. |
8 | Built-in dashboards for visualization | No. But can be built according to cluster administrator's requirements using the Grafana deployment which comes included with the metrics stack. | Yes. Also supports custom dashboards creation and alerting. |
9 | Configurable logging | Yes. | Yes. |
10 | Updating the configuration of AI components at runtime | Yes. Using management commands. | Yes. |
11 | In-place code update (Update the code without bringing down the model) | No. | Yes. But code update mechanism will trigger the restart of the whole block and its replicas. |
12 | Implementation of custom management commands as the part of the AI block | Yes. AIOS instance SDK can support implementation of custom management commands. | No. |
13 | Dynamic request batching | Yes. Requests can be pooled and processed in batches. | Yes. Requests can be pooled and processed in batches. |
14 | gRPC inference server for submitting tasks to AI components / AI workflows | Yes. | Yes. |
15 | FastAPI based REST API server for submitting tasks to AI components/AI workflows | No. | Yes. |
16 | Customizable quota management in the Inference gateway | Yes. Quota management logic can be implemented using a python policy. | No. |
17 | Framework for building programmable auditing logic for workflow outputs | Yes. Auditing policies can be built to periodically collect and audit workflow outputs for QA. | No. |
18 | Built in Jupyter notebook integration and workspaces | No. | Yes. |
19 | Catching application-level failures | Yes. Users can use application level exception handling and logging to report errors. | Yes. |
20 | State check-pointing and state restoration upon block restarts | No. | Yes. Actor checkpointing API can be used to programmatically save and restore states. |
21 | LLM metrics and Custom LLM Metrics | Yes. | Yes. |
22 | Job schedules - schedule jobs using CRON pattern at specified intervals | No. But will be added in the future. | Yes. |
23 | Support for local testing of AI block | Yes. | Yes. |
24 | Support for local testing AI workflows end to end | No. | Yes. |
Comparision summary
General Definition & Architecture
- Definition: AIGrid is described as a decentralized network of interconnected AI components that coordinate to share data, perform tasks, and compose into higher-level collective intelligence. Ray is an open-source unified framework for scaling AI and Python applications like machine learning, providing the compute layer for parallel processing without requiring expertise in distributed systems. Anyscale is a platform built on top of Ray to manage deployments on a Ray cluster.
- Multi-cluster support: AIGrid supports multiple federated clusters managed by a central management cluster, which can be deployed on heterogeneous clouds, data-centers, or homegrown clusters. Anyscale supports multiple clouds, and it schedules Ray workflows on these clusters based on resource availability. However, a single Ray cluster cannot span across multiple Kubernetes clusters.
Infrastructure, Deployment & Node Management
- Nodes federation / Machine pooling support: Yes, nodes can be added to an existing cluster in AIGrid. Yes, nodes can be added to an existing cluster (known as customer managed machine pool) in Ray/AnyScale.
- Can run without Kubernetes? AIGrid cannot run without Kubernetes. Components of the Ray ecosystem, such as RayServe and Ray, can run without Kubernetes.
- Built-in managed VPC for nodes federation: AIGrid does not provide a built-in managed VPC; it depends on custom VPC, VPN, or firewall settings configured between the cluster and a node during federation, allowing clusters to use services like Tailscale, WireGuard, or any VPN. Anyscale provides a built-in VPC which uses Tailscale under the hood.
- Horizontal Cluster scaling: AIGrid does not dynamically add new nodes to the cluster based on demand; clusters must be set up with pre-configured nodes, and scaling happens within the available resource pool. New nodes must be added manually. Anyscale/Ray can tap into cloud vendor infrastructure APIs to autoscale clusters by adding more nodes.
Governance, Policies & Security
- Flexible network/cluster governance using programmable policies: AIGrid supports custom Python policies to govern the addition/removal of clusters, workload scheduling, and executing management clusters at both management cluster and individual worker cluster levels. Ray/AnyScale has a limited set of rule definitions based on IAM and RBAC rules provided by cloud vendors.
- Programmable turing complete policies and built-in policies execution system: Yes, AIGrid is built with customizability in mind, supporting programmable policies across multiple functionalities using Python. It provides a built-in system to execute these policies locally within modules or deployed as functions, graphs, or jobs. Ray/AnyScale's autoscaler provides a customizable policy-like interface using Python, but no extensive support for customizability across different functionalities.
- Built-in secret management for credentials, API keys storage: AIGrid does not have built-in secret management currently, but it is in the roadmap. Anyscale can tap into the secret management stores provided by cloud vendors.
- Built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines: AIGrid does not have built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines. Anyscale supports built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines.
- Customizable quota management in the Inference gateway: AIGrid allows quota management logic to be implemented using a Python policy. Ray/AnyScale does not have customizable quota management in the inference gateway.
- AI block selection for inference task submission using a programmable selection logic: AIGrid allows inference task submission to contain a search query that can be used to select the right AI block for inference. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Assignment of Workflow DAG nodes on existing blocks using programmable assignment logic: In AIGrid, a vDAG specification can contain a programmable selection/assignment Python policy for each node, evaluated to select a block for that node. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Customizable and programmable health anomaly detection: AIGrid allows a programmable Python policy to be used to ingest health check data and detect anomalies. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Framework for building programmable auditing logic for workflow outputs: AIGrid supports building auditing policies to periodically collect and audit workflow outputs for QA. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
Data & Storage
- Persistent Storage Options available: AIGrid supports Object storage (Ceph via assets registry APIs), remote. Local file-system volume of the node, and FrameDB persistent storage (TiDB integration). Ray/AnyScale supports Object storage (remote only), local file system volume of the node, and shared network storage using NFS.
- In-memory shared database support for storing objects locally and globally: AIGrid provides FrameDB. Ray/AnyScale provides Plasma Store.
- Persistent database storage support for storing objects in a persistent storage volume locally and globally: AIGrid supports TiDB integration with FrameDB. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Backup and restore of in-memory/persistent objects to S3 like object storage: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Sharing of objects across multiple nodes and creation of local copies: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- In-memory/Persistent object store serialization format: AIGrid is flexible; serialization/deserialization is handled by the application, and the store holds raw bytes. Ray/AnyScale uses Apache Arrow serialization/deserialization format.
- Reference counting and garbage collection of objects with zero reference count: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Built-in Ingestion support for stream data: AIGrid has built-in ingestion support for stream data. Ray/AnyScale does not.
- Video/Live camera inference support: AIGrid supports video/live camera inference. Ray/AnyScale does not have built-in library support, though it can be built at the application layer.
Registries & Reusability
- Built-in registries to store assets, container images, components and specifications for re-use: AIGrid has Assets registry (files, source code, models), Container registry (stores and pulls images locally), Components registry (AI instance images), and Spec store (usable specifications for vDAGs and Blocks). Ray/AnyScale does not have these built-in registries.
- Support for nested workflows: AIGrid allows referencing already deployed vDAGs within the current vDAG by specifying the vDAG URI. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Sharing of the AI blocks across multiple workflows: AIGrid allows a block to be shared across multiple workflows by assigning the node of the workflow to it. Ray/AnyScale does not support sharing the same block (or component) across multiple workflows.
Workload Definition & Management (Blocks, vDAGs, Specifications)
- Support for multi-cluster AI workflows: Yes, interconnected AI components forming a workflow in AIGrid can span across multiple clusters. No, interconnected AI components in a Ray workflow cannot span across multiple clusters.
- Support for composable AI as workflows (Model composition/vDAGs): AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Composable AI specification type: AIGrid uses JSON with template-based parsing. Ray/AnyScale uses Python code using the Ray library.
- Support for conditional routing within the workflow: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for side-cars as utility applications connected to the main AI component: AIGrid can spin up side-cars as custom pods connected to the main AI block for extending functionality. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Updating the configuration of AI components at runtime: AIGrid supports this using management commands. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Implementation of custom management commands as the part of the AI block: AIGrid's AIOS instance SDK can support the implementation of custom management commands. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
Resource Management & Scheduling
- Supports scaling of individual AI blocks that are part of the workflow: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for manual scaling of AI blocks: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for specifying min and max replicas per AI block: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for autoscaling based on metrics: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Autoscaling using programmable policy for flexible decision making: In AIGrid, the autoscaler is completely programmable using the policies system. In Ray/AnyScale, the autoscaler is completely programmable using Python and the Ray library.
- Support for NVIDIA GPU Accelerators for AI block scheduling: AIGrid supports GPU-based metrics collection and scheduling based on GPU availability by default. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for Google TPUs, Intel Gaudi, Huawei Ascend for AI block scheduling: AIGrid does not currently support these, but there are plans for future support. Ray/AnyScale supports these accelerators via community contributions.
- Framework for porting custom accelerators: AIGrid does not have a framework for porting custom accelerators. Ray/AnyScale has a framework for porting custom accelerators.
- Framework for adding custom accelerators for resource allocation: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Customizable AI scheduling (allocation) using programmable policies: AIGrid allows resource allocation for AI blocks to be customized using a Python policy. Ray/AnyScale provides fixed resource allocation strategies.
- Concept of Placement groups: AIGrid does not have the concept of placement groups. Ray/AnyScale has placement groups, useful for gang scheduling in deep learning training and inference serving.
- Support for deploying the AI block on multiple GPUs: AIGrid supports this if the inference framework allows it. Ray/AnyScale supports this if the inference framework allows it.
- Support for deploying multiple AI blocks on same GPU (GPU sharing): AIGrid supports GPU sharing. Ray/AnyScale supports GPU sharing.
Training & Inference Features
- Built-in model training infrastructure: AIGrid does not have built-in model training infrastructure. Ray/AnyScale has built-in model training infrastructure.
- Model Multiplexing: AIGrid does not have built-in model multiplexing, but it can be achieved by specifying the AI block selection query during inference task submission. Ray/AnyScale has built-in selection for model multiplexing.
- Support for streaming inference: AIGrid supports providing data to AI workflows as streams. Ray/AnyScale supports providing data to AI workflows as streams.
- Support for batch inference: AIGrid supports batch inference using datasets stored in in-memory or persistent local Frame-DB databases. Ray/AnyScale supports batch inference using data stored in the Plasma store.
- Out of band communication support using NCCL: AIGrid has very limited alpha support for NCCL OOB communication. Ray/AnyScale supports NCCL OOB communication.
- Custom communication protocol between blocks of the workflow (Out of band communication): AIGrid does not support this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Custom pre and post-processor for each node in the AI workflow: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for multiple inference frameworks and libraries: AIGrid allows importing, using, and packaging inference libraries with the AI block. Ray/AnyScale supports multiple inference frameworks and libraries.
- Support for deploying and serving LLM models: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Support for Composing of AI workflows constituting LLM and non-LLM models: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- OpenAI compatible API for LLM serving: AIGrid does not currently have an OpenAI compatible API for LLM serving, but it will be added in the future. Ray/AnyScale has an OpenAI compatible API for LLM serving.
- LLM metrics and Custom LLM Metrics: AIGrid supports LLM metrics and custom LLM metrics. Ray/AnyScale supports LLM metrics and custom LLM metrics.
- Multi-node LLM deployment with built-in splitting of LLM models and distribution: AIGrid has no built-in support for this, but it can be deployed using third-party vLLM clusters alongside the AI block with init container automation. Ray/AnyScale has built-in vLLM integration.
- Support for custom model splitting and distributed inference across clusters: AIGrid supports this for a very limited set of model architectures. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Engine agnostic architecture for LLM inference: AIGrid is engine agnostic; any LLM serving library can be embedded, or any third-party inference server can be linked and automated via init containers. Ray/AnyScale is engine agnostic.
- Multi-LoRA support with shared base models: AIGrid does not support this. Ray/AnyScale supports multi-LoRA with shared base models.
- Fast model loading with safe tensors and local machine cache: AIGrid does not currently support this, but it will be added in the future. Anyscale supports fast model loading with safe tensors and local machine cache.
APIs & Interfaces
- SDKs to build and deploy AI instances: AIGrid provides SDKs. Ray/AnyScale provides SDKs.
- gRPC inference server for submitting tasks to AI components / AI workflows: AIGrid supports a gRPC inference server. Ray/AnyScale supports a gRPC inference server.
- FastAPI based REST API server for submitting tasks to AI components/AI workflows: AIGrid does not support a FastAPI based REST API server. Ray/AnyScale supports a FastAPI based REST API server.
Observability & Monitoring
- Metrics storage solution: AIGrid provides both default built-in storage for current metrics needed by policies and supports optional deployment of Prometheus stack for long-term storage. Anyscale provides a metrics storage solution as part of its stack.
- Support for custom application metrics: AIGrid supports custom application metrics. Ray supports custom application metrics.
- Built-in Platform System metrics: AIGrid has built-in Platform System metrics. Ray has built-in Platform System metrics.
- Built-in collection of hardware metrics: AIGrid collects hardware metrics using a metrics collector daemonset deployed on every node by default. Ray exports hardware metrics as part of its built-in platform metrics.
- Dashboard UI for management: AIGrid does not have a built-in dashboard UI for management. Anyscale has a dashboard UI for management.
- Built-in dashboards for visualization: AIGrid does not have built-in dashboards but supports building them using Grafana (included with the metrics stack). Anyscale has built-in dashboards and supports custom dashboard creation and alerting.
- Configurable logging: AIGrid supports configurable logging. Anyscale supports configurable logging.
- AI blocks replica health checking: AIGrid supports periodic health checking of all replicas of an AI block. Ray/AnyScale supports periodic health checking of all replicas of an AI block.
Fault Tolerance
- AI blocks replica health checking: (Also listed under Observability) AIGrid supports periodic health checking of all replicas of an AI block. Ray/AnyScale supports periodic health checking of all replicas of an AI block.
- Catching application-level failures: AIGrid allows users to use application-level exception handling and logging to report errors. Ray supports catching application-level failures.
- State check-pointing and state restoration upon block restarts: AIGrid does not support this. Ray supports this using the Actor checkpointing API to programmatically save and restore states.
- Recovery of lost objects using Lineage reconstruction: AIGrid does not support recovery using lineage reconstruction. Ray supports recovery of lost objects using lineage reconstruction.
Integration
- Built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines: (Also listed under Governance) AIGrid does not have built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines. Anyscale supports built-in integration with CI/CD pipelines.
- Connecting external / third party servers to the AI blocks: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale supports this; the block can contain Python functions that interact with external services.
- Automating the deployment of third party services on the cluster using init containers at the time of AI block creation: AIGrid supports this. Ray/AnyScale does not support this.
- Built-in Cross language programming: AIGrid does not have built-in cross-language programming, but users can handle interactions with other languages explicitly by packaging them with the AI block. Ray has partial support for cross-language programming (Java to Python and Python to Java).
- Built in Jupyter notebook integration and workspaces: AIGrid does not have built-in Jupyter notebook integration and workspaces. Ray/AnyScale supports built-in Jupyter notebook integration and workspaces.
Communication & Data Format
- Out of band communication support using NCCL: (Also listed under Training/Inference) AIGrid has very limited alpha support. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Custom communication protocol between blocks of the workflow (Out of band communication): (Also listed under Training/Inference) AIGrid does not support this. Ray/AnyScale supports this.
- Core communication data format: AIGrid uses Protobuf and flexible serialization/deserialization with in-memory FrameDB. Ray/AnyScale uses Plasma Object (PyArrow format).
Development & Testing
- Support for local testing of AI block: AIGrid supports local testing of AI blocks. Ray/AnyScale supports local testing of AI blocks.
- Support for local testing AI workflows end to end: AIGrid does not support local end-to-end workflow testing. Ray/AnyScale supports local end-to-end workflow testing.
Other Features
- Dynamic request batching: AIGrid supports dynamic request batching. Ray/AnyScale supports dynamic request batching.
- Customizable batching logic: AIGrid allows developers to write custom batching logic using the AIOS instance SDK. Ray/AnyScale does not have customizable batching logic; fixed batching parameters can be provided.
- Job schedules: AIGrid does not currently support scheduling jobs using a CRON pattern, but it will be added in the future. Anyscale supports scheduling jobs using a CRON pattern.
- Supports non AI workflowns and non-AI computation as blocks: AIGrid supports non-AI workloads and computation as blocks. Ray/AnyScale supports non-AI workloads and computation.